
Turn ChatGPT into your personal critical-thinking coach with these 10 plug-and-play prompts. Save, copy, paste—level up your decisions at work today!  Root-Cause Drill ¡°Act as my critical-thinking partner. I¡¯m facing [PROBLEM]. Use the 5-Whys to build a Why-Chain, expose the deepest root cause, and give me 2-3 evidence-based fixes. Format: Problem ¡æ Why-Chain ¡æ Root Cause ¡æ Recommended Solutions.¡±  Conflict X-Ray ¡°Here are two clashing views: [A] vs [B]. Strip each to its logical bones, flag hidden assumptions/biases, and propose a balanced resolution. Deliver in a table: Perspective | Strengths | Weaknesses | Assumptions | Recommendation.¡±  Decision Under Constraints ¡°I must choose [DECISION] with these limits: [BUDGET/TIME/RESOURCES]. Build a pros/cons matrix, surface hidden risks, and name the best option. Output: Options ¡æ Pros ¡æ Cons ¡æ Risks ¡æ Final Recommendation.¡±  Assumption Audit ¡°Critique my plan: [PLAN]. List every hidden assumption, rate its validity, show the fallout if it¡¯s wrong, and give a mitigation tactic. Structure: Assumption ¡æ Validity Check ¡æ Impact-if-Wrong ¡æ Mitigation.¡±  Scenario Planning ¡°Help me brace for uncertainty around [SITUATION]. Build three scenarios—Best, Worst, Most Likely—and for each give early triggers, consequences, and an action plan. Table rows = scenarios; columns = Triggers | Consequences | Recommended Actions.¡±  Ethical Triple-Lens ¡°I face this ethical dilemma: [SITUATION]. Analyse it through (1) utilitarian consequences, (2) deontological duties, (3) core values. Compare the three views and finish with a balanced, ethical recommendation.¡±  Data Sanity Check ¡°My evidence for a decision is: [DATA]. Is it valid, complete, and unbiased? Spot gaps and misinterpretations, and state what extra proof I need. Template: Evidence ¡æ Potential Issues ¡æ Missing Information ¡æ Next Steps.¡±  Fallacy Hunt ¡°Here¡¯s a proposal: [TEXT]. Scan it for logical fallacies (false cause, slippery slope, ad hominem, appeal to authority, etc.). For each hit, explain why it weakens the case and suggest a logically sound rewrite.¡±  Risk Register ¡°I¡¯m launching [PROJECT/INITIATIVE]. Run a structured risk assessment: list risks, score Probability & Impact (H/M/L), and craft mitigations. Output: Risk ¡æ Probability ¡æ Impact ¡æ Mitigation Strategy.¡±  Reflective Post-Mortem ¡°My recent project: [PROJECT]. Help me learn from it. List successes, failures, faulty assumptions, actionable lessons, and next steps. Format: Successes ¡æ Failures ¡æ Faulty Assumptions ¡æ Actionable Lessons ¡æ Next Steps.¡± Screenshot the carousel, drop your favourite number in the comments, and tag a teammate who needs sharper thinking! |